Risks & Threats: The 3rd of 7 Key Foundations of Strategic Planning
By: Larry Goddard and Jennifer Goddard
When Risks Are Ignored, Strategy Becomes Wishful Thinking
Most leadership teams are comfortable talking about growth opportunities.
Far fewer spend time discussing what could actually derail the plan.
Yet every strategy operates within a landscape of uncertainty. Markets shift. Competitors respond. Costs rise. Customers change behavior.
The issue isn’t that risks exist.
The issue is when they’re not openly acknowledged or thoughtfully planned for.
A simple test is to ask:
• What external factors could significantly impact our performance over the next 12–36 months?
• Where are we most exposed operationally, financially, or competitively?
• What assumptions in our strategy could prove wrong?
If these questions are difficult to answer, the challenge usually isn’t intelligence or experience.
It’s that many organizations prefer to focus on what they want to happen rather than what might happen.
But strong strategic planning requires both.
The Difference Between Risks and Weaknesses
Weaknesses are internal limitations.
Risks and threats are typically external forces that can influence outcomes.
Examples often include:
• Economic slowdowns or market contraction
• Supply chain instability
• Regulatory or policy changes
• Aggressive competitors
• Technological disruption
• Shifts in customer expectations
Many of these factors sit outside a company’s control.
But they are rarely outside a company’s ability to anticipate and prepare for.
Strategy Improves When Leaders Face Reality
The purpose of identifying risks isn’t pessimism.
It’s preparation.
When leadership teams openly evaluate threats, several things happen:
✓ Assumptions become clearer
✓ Contingency plans become possible
✓ Investments become more disciplined
✓ The organization becomes more resilient
Ignoring threats doesn’t make them disappear.
It only ensures they will arrive unexpected and unmanaged.
Strong Strategies Balance Opportunity and Risk
The best strategic plans do two things at the same time:
They pursue opportunity while protecting against downside exposure.
That balance is what separates optimistic planning from durable strategy.
When risks and threats are clearly understood, leadership teams can move forward with greater confidence—because they’ve already considered what might stand in the way.
And that clarity dramatically improves the odds of execution.
Question to consider this week:
What risks could disrupt our strategy—and how prepared are we to respond if they do?

